🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision over how to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.